março 01, 2007

todas opções estão na mesa

ai ki-meda.

vai aqui um trecho do jornal 'progressista' common dreams

What we are seeing now is the conservative message machine preparing the country to accept the ideas of a nuclear war and nation destruction against Iran. The technique used is the "slippery slope." It is done by degrees. Like the proverbial frog in the pot of water – if the heat is turned up slowly the frog gets used to the heat and eventually boils to death – the American public is getting gradually acclimated to the idea of war with Iran.

First, describe Iran as evil – part of the axis of evil. An inherently evil person will inevitably do evil things and can't be negotiated with. An entire evil nation is a threat to other nations.
Second, describe Iran's leader as a "Hitler" who is inherently "evil" and cannot be reasoned with. Refuse to negotiate with him.
Then repeat the lie that Iran is on the verge of having nuclear weapons —weapons of mass destruction. IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei says they are at best many years away.
Call nuclear development "an existential threat" – a threat to our very existence.
Then suggest a single "surgical" "attack" on Natanz and make it seem acceptable.
Then find a reason to call the attack "self-defense" — or better protection for our troops from the EFP's, or single-shot canister bombs.
Claim, without proof and without anyone even taking responsibility for the claim, that the Iranian government at its highest level is supplying deadly weapons to Shiite militias attacking our troops, while not mentioning the fact that Saudi Arabia is helping Sunni insurgents attacking our troops.
Give "protecting our troops" as a reason for attacking Iran without getting new authorization from Congress. Claim that the old authorization for attacking Iraq implied doing "whatever is necessary to protect our troops" from Iranian intervention in Iraq.
Argue that de-escalation in Iraq would "bleed" our troops, "weaken" America, and lead to defeat. This sets up escalation as a winning policy, if not in Iraq then in Iran.
Get the press to go along with each step.
Never mention the words "preventive nuclear war" or "national destruction." When asked, say "All options are on the table." Keep the issue of nuclear war and its consequences from being seriously discussed by the national media.
Intimidate Democratic presidential candidates into agreeing, without using the words, that nuclear war should be "on the table." This makes nuclear war and nation destruction bipartisan and even more acceptable.

leia toda a matéria "The Words None Dare Say: Nuclear War"
escrita por George Lakoff

common dreams é bem bacana, é um pouco de luz na mentalidade tacanha dos estadunidenses.

bom, se você pagar uma visitinha por lá, passeie também pela eletronic intifada pra ver as sacanagens que o estado de israel, bancado pelos norte-americanos, anda fazendo por lá: o apartheid disfarçado (disfarçado???).

ah! quase me esqueço, o ironic times também é muito bom e muito bem humorado. e tem essa exposição de origami sexual no village voice, muito divertida também.

Posted by alberto at março 1, 2007 07:12 PM
Comments

Oi, Alberto,
blogue, também é cultura!
Legal verificar que por lá, muito mais do que imaginamos, a insatisfação e a contrariedade, é um fato.
abs
fernando cals

Posted by: fernando cals at março 2, 2007 09:43 AM

os EUA já começaram a realizar "black-ops" dentro e fora do Irã. Sequestraram um ministro iraniano no Iraque. Estão perpetrando toda a sorte de provocações, e estão colocando mais dois porta-aviões no mar Vermelho. É grave a situação. A pergunta é: a opinião pública vai permitir MAIS UMA AVENTURA BÉLICA IRREMEDIÁVEL? Não apenas irremediável, mas que pode ser o gatilho de uma guerra nuclear? Ou mesmo de uma terceira guerra mundial?

Posted by: nOJINSK at março 2, 2007 10:53 AM

ai, cadê meu prozac?

Posted by: anna at março 2, 2007 01:11 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?